US District Court NY Decision Author’s Guild v. Google

We are in favor of building a digital library system that has many
winners, but the Google book settlement seems like a bridge
too far.  We are sorry that it had to go this way, but the monopolistic aspects of the settlement do seem problematic.

New approaches are emerging that do not have central points of control and could help publishers, libraries, authors, and readers:

  • orphan works legislation might now be possible that can help with opening the results of mass digitization efforts,
  • libraries are buying ebooks and scanning older books to lend them to patrons, and
  • libraries for the blind and dyslexic are expanding rapidly.

-brewster

(The decision document can be seen at http://www.archive.org/stream/UsDistrictCourtNyDecisionAuthorsGuildV.Google/chin_asa_decision#page/n0/mode/2up)

 

 

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to US District Court NY Decision Author’s Guild v. Google

  1. MY NAME IS REV.SISTER PRISCA TABO FORM CAMEROON .A FRANCISCAN SISTER. says:

    I am very impressed with the way you have organized your archives .This makes me think of how to do mine .I am working with disabled persons now for about 29 years as aphysiotherapist and have been working with some friends from Canada and prisicely from TONTO.iHAVE ALSO SEEN WHAT YOUR Archdioces have done to some schools in Cameroon and I JUST WOULD LIKE TO CONGRATULATE YOU FOR ALL THIS GOOD AND WELL ORGANIZED PROGRAMES ESPECIALLY THE ARCHIVES .GOD BLESS YOU WE SHALL SHARE MORE SINCE I HAVE STARTED .
    YOURS IN CHRIST SR PRISCA TABO .
    n/b GREETINGS TO THE ARCHBISOP OF TORONTOFROM ME

  2. Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve be mindful your stuff prior to and you’re just extremely magnificent. I actually like what you’ve bought here, certainly like what you are saying and the way in which during which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you continue to care for to keep it sensible. I can’t wait to learn far more from you. That is really a tremendous website.

  3. Big Al says:

    I read the decision. Preventing Google from steamrolling over copyright law seemed the only decision. The books they did scan and offered had rather confusing wording regarding use. The name Google alone would have scared enough unknowledgeable consumers from exercising fair rights of usage. That Google presented this grab as a benefit to the public is pretty outrageous.

Comments are closed.